1. Evidence over assertion
An institution's statement that it does something is the start of a question, not the end of one. For each axis of the framework we ask for the documents, records, data and examples that show it, and we test them against what the institution says.
2. One standard, adjusted for level
Every applicant is measured against the same seven axes. What changes with the level (associate, bachelor, master, doctoral, certificate) is the depth of evidence expected for the credential being awarded, not the standard itself.
3. Self-assessment first
The institution reviews itself before we do. A candid self-assessment tells reviewers where to look and shows whether the institution knows its own strengths and weaknesses. Weaknesses that are identified and being addressed count in an institution's favour.
4. Accreditation is continuous
A decision is a starting point for annual monitoring, not a certificate to be framed and forgotten. Accredited institutions report each year and their public record is kept current.
In practice. Read the process, then the self-assessment guide. Both are public so that you know in advance what will be asked.